Featured
China's Stimulus No Better Than America's; Local Governments Piling Up Huge Debts
by Niccolo MachiavelliObama tried a stimulus and so did we. Now we both have debt problems... Many are predicting that we are seeing the demise of the American economic model and the rise of China's. To those one might say: not so fast. China has huge debt problems of its own. ...
- Greg Gutfeld: ‘Red Eye’ Podcast: That Jerk In a Mosh PitCarl Kozlowski: ‘Friends With Benefits’ Review: Great Cast In Teriffic RomcomBob McCarty: St. Louis Cookie Stand Lawsuit Goes to CourtRep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA): What Does Raising the Debt Limit Mean to You Personally?
Bret Jacobson: UPDATE: Union Goon Only Supports ‘Some’ Violence?
Pamela Geller: Unholy War in Texas EscalatesP.J. Salvatore: Cenk Uygur’s Rambling Reason for Getting Axed at MSNBC Categories
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- arms control/disarmament
- Asia
- Border Security
- Burma
- chemical/biological weapons
- China
- Communism
- Congress
- Cuba
- Culture/Art
- cyber threats
- Economy
- education
- Energy
- Espionage
- Europe
- Featured Story
- Foreign Policy
- ground zero mosque
- History
- Homeland Security
- human rights
- Humanitarian
- Intelligence
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islam
- Islamic extremism
- Israel
- Justice/Legal
- Latin America
- Media Criticism
- Michael Yon Dispatches
- Middle East
- Military Technology
- News
- North Korea
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Obama
- Open Thread
- Other
- Politics
- Russia
- saudi arabia
- sharia
- Soldiers
- Strategy
- Terrorism
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- veterans
- Weapons
Blogroll
- 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America
- ABCNews
- Ace of Spades HQ
- Agence France Press
- American Foreign Policy Council
- American Legion
- American Spectator
- Ann Coulter
- Army Times
- Associated Press
- Atlas Shrugs
- Ben Shapiro
- Big Hollywood
- BLACKFIVE
- BlogsLucianneLoves.com
- Bloomberg
- Bob McCarty
- Boston Globe
- Breitbart.com
- Breitbart.tv
- C-SPAN
- Canada Free Press
- Castle Argghhh!
- CDR Salamander
- Center for Security Policy
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- Center for Vision & Values
- Charles Krauthammer
- Chicago Tribune
- China Post
- Christopher Hitchens
- Claremont Institute
- Commentary
- Daily Gut
- Defense News
- Dennis Miller Radio
- Dennis Prager
- Der Spiegel
- Diana West
- Drudge Report
- Economist
- Financial Times
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Policy Research Institute
- Founding Bloggers
- Fox Nation
- Fox News
- Free Republic
- Freedom House
- Gates of Vienna
- Gateway Pundit
- GayPatriot
- Generational Dynamics
- George Marshall Institute
- George Will
- Glenn Beck
- Heritage Foundation
- Hot Air
- Huffington Post
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- Instapundit
- Institute of World Politics
- Investors Business Daily
- James Hudnall
- James Madison Institute
- Jawa Report
- Jerusalem Post
- John Gibson
- John Nolte
- Khaleej Times
- Lars Larson
- Laura Ingraham
- LibertarianRepublican.net
- Long War Journal
- Los Angeles Times
- Lucianne.com
- Mark Levin
- Mark Steyn
- Media Research Center
- Melanie Morgan
- Michael Savage
- Michael Walsh
- Michael Yon
- Mickey Kaus
- Mike Flynn
- Military Officers Association of America
- Move America Forward
- MSNBC
- National Center for Public Policy Research
- National Review
- National Review’s The Corner
- Nationalsecurity.org
- Navy Times
- Neal Boortz
- New Republic
- New York Magazine
- New York Post
- New York Times
- Newport Beach Now
- NewsBusters
- Newsweek
- Pajamas Media
- Pat Dollard
- Patterico’s Pontifications
- Politico
- Power Line
- PR Newswire
- Pravda
- Protein Wisdom
- Real Clear Politics
- Reason
- RedState
- Rep. McCotter YouTube Channel
- Reuters
- Ricochet
- Roger L. Simon
- Roll Call
- Rolling Stone
- Rush Limbaugh
- Rusty Humphries
- Salon
- Sean Hannity
- SecureAmericaNow.org
- Slate
- Smoking Gun
- South Park Episodes
- Tammy Bruce
- The Brody File
- The Daily Beast
- The Daily Caller
- The Enterprise Report
- The Hill
- The National Interest
- The Spectator U.K.
- Thomas Sowell
- Time
- Times U.K.
- Townhall.com
- U.K. Daily Mail
- U.K. Guardian
- U.K. Telegraph
- U.S. News
- USA Today
- Vanity Fair
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Wall Street Journal
- Washington Examiner
- Washington Post
- Washington Times
- Weekly Standard
- WorldThreats.com
Comments (27)
Logging you in...
When will our incompetents within the stateless dept and the rest of
this fumbling administration realize that the middle east is tribal in
nature, and will continue to be so for generations. Iraq has problems
with its parliament due to tribal disagreements and fighting between the
Shiite and Sunni. Afghanistan is worse. Typical situtation for DC -
SNAFU.
Is there anything new in this article? Our government has no idea how
to solve the problems of A-stan. In reality we can not solve their
problems, the people have to solve their problems. And until the people
get fed up with their religion they will be slaves to the Imams.
Reply
Everyone knows that Obama uses the military as a pawn: random wars,
random bombings, surges, draw-downs, etc. All the while he threatens
their pay, and he ties their hands behind their back with treasonous
rules of engagement. That said, BRING THE TROOPS HOME...NOW! We should
not be sacrificing young Americans lives to nation-build for
islamo-nazis.
There are several things the United States can and should do...
There is one thing the US cannot and should not do...spend more money THAT WE DON'T HAVE on this wasteland. When we get done training them, rebuilding them, and educating them, we will have a better trained, better educated, and stronger enemy.
Let the power vacuum destabilize the region for awhile. Just my humble opinion.
There is one thing the US cannot and should not do...spend more money THAT WE DON'T HAVE on this wasteland. When we get done training them, rebuilding them, and educating them, we will have a better trained, better educated, and stronger enemy.
Let the power vacuum destabilize the region for awhile. Just my humble opinion.
Reply
"While we can expect Pakistan to balk at letting Indian goods (and
security forces) cross its territory, we should not expect it to stop
its ally—and financial benefactor—the United States. Private US firms
could contract to provide the services that will enable Indian companies
to prevail and keep that mineral wealth from falling into Chinese
hands."
You are dreaming, you do know that. If you think the Pakistanis will sit by while Indians go across their territory, territory that is controlled by radical jihadists no less, then you really are dreaming. As for all these other countries like China and Iran trying to gain influence in Afghanistan, let them try it. We've been there for 10 years and have not made a dent in that corrupt, barbaric, society. Let them have it. If they think they can tame the Afghans, they are as stupid as we are. Nobody has successfully occupied Afghanistan for any great length of time without, in the end, simply leaving and coming to the conclusion that it just isn't worth the effort. So let them try. I still say we should just keep one or two bases in Northern Afghanistan with the tribes that like us, just to keep an eye on al Qaeda and the Taliban. But, other than that, the Afghans can go back to what the do best, which is slaughter each other and trying to keep their country in the 15th century.
You are dreaming, you do know that. If you think the Pakistanis will sit by while Indians go across their territory, territory that is controlled by radical jihadists no less, then you really are dreaming. As for all these other countries like China and Iran trying to gain influence in Afghanistan, let them try it. We've been there for 10 years and have not made a dent in that corrupt, barbaric, society. Let them have it. If they think they can tame the Afghans, they are as stupid as we are. Nobody has successfully occupied Afghanistan for any great length of time without, in the end, simply leaving and coming to the conclusion that it just isn't worth the effort. So let them try. I still say we should just keep one or two bases in Northern Afghanistan with the tribes that like us, just to keep an eye on al Qaeda and the Taliban. But, other than that, the Afghans can go back to what the do best, which is slaughter each other and trying to keep their country in the 15th century.
Reply
Our "foreign policy experts" (that's a joke) have never ever understood
the tribal nature of the ME.....they just can't ! So, IMHO we should be
mining the incredible mineral resources that are found in Afghanistan;
protect the assets with our military and then GTFO!
Reply
The War on White America and all the Good done. Communists have declared WAR. http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-characterizes-w...
Reply
Foreign policy experts?
Just another oxymoron like 'military intelligence',or "change you can believe in".....
Just another oxymoron like 'military intelligence',or "change you can believe in".....
Reply
Bring the troops home.........
WARM UP THE SILOS..........
Any terrorist attacks..........
trace the culprit or culprits..........
AND SOMEBODY GETS NUKED.
============
BTW..........0BAMA IS A LIAR.
WARM UP THE SILOS..........
Any terrorist attacks..........
trace the culprit or culprits..........
AND SOMEBODY GETS NUKED.
============
BTW..........0BAMA IS A LIAR.
Reply
Comments by IntenseDebate

Subscribe via RSS









Another Foreign Policy Disaster and New South Asia Power Dynamics
President Obama’s accelerated “drawdown” of US troops in Afghanistan will, at the very least, create a power vacuum; and the list of candidates to fill it is not encouraging. No serious analyst believes the government of Hamid Karzai will get the job done, as it lacks both popular support and the necessary resources. Moreover, despite all our efforts at nation building, there is no “Afghan people” but rather a collection of Pashtuns, Tajiks, and others living in territories controlled by hetmen and drug lords.
The Taliban continue operating in force as evidenced by ongoing attacks and a recent jailbreak that freed almost 500 terrorists. Obama’s call to negotiate with its “moderates” whatever that means, has enhanced its chances of returning to power. Iran shares an 800 mile border with Afghanistan and is making noise about protecting the Shiite Hazara in this Sunni Muslim country. (Can anyone say Sudeten Germans?) It could take over Afghanistan’s heartland, while a fawning international community hails it as a human rights defender. China also borders Afghanistan, and its meddling in the region is growing. It effectively annexed Kashmir’s northeast using the same rationale as it did to grab Tibet and took a “great leap forward” in regional ties with last year’s Sino-Pakistan nuclear pact. It has been wooing Karzai, recently feting him like a king in Beijing, and has expanded its economic base by, as one example, developing a major copper field in Afghanistan’s Logar province.
Pakistan remains a major candidate to take power, especially with the American government’s penchant to tolerate Pakistani duplicity. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called the Pak-Afghan connection “organic,” and the US withdrawal could render their mutual nothing more than a formality like the one separating Syria and Lebanon.
Given those multiple nightmare scenarios, it is perplexing that the Obama administration continues to ignore the one regional power whose interests are not inimical to ours: India. Our foreign policy interests coincide; it is the only effective counterweight against otherwise unchecked Chinese expansionism; it has the requisite economic, military, and intelligence capability; and the specter of increased Indian influence in the region scares the pants off the Pakistanis and might get them to behave. China’s Afghanistan venture is also part of its strategy to encircle India.
Incredibly, rather than recognizing the threat to our common interests and partnering with India to stop it, “the Obama administration is practically rolling out an Afghan red carpet for China,” according to a respected Asian affairs analyst out of Singapore. Obama also looked the other way when, according to Matthew Rosenberg of the Wall Street Journal, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani lobbied Karzai “against building a long-term strategic partnership with the U.S., urging him instead to look to Pakistan—and its Chinese ally—for help in striking a peace deal with the Taliban.”
There are several things the United States can and should do, starting with an intensive diplomatic effort to engage India instead of China to further American interests, not Chinese. With over 100,000 troops in Afghanistan, the US still has enough gravitas to influence events in the country. The best place to change direction and use that weight is Bamiyam, Wardak, and Parwan provinces, where Indians are bidding for the right to extract iron ore from the enormous Hagijak mine; but the 15 Indian companies have a problem their competitors do not: how to transport the extracted minerals through 400 miles of Pakistani territory. The US can help. While we can expect Pakistan to balk at letting Indian goods (and security forces) cross its territory, we should not expect it to stop its ally—and financial benefactor—the United States. Private US firms could contract to provide the services that will enable Indian companies to prevail and keep that mineral wealth from falling into Chinese hands.
The Hajigak mine project is only the most obvious point where the India-US relationship can provide a strong presence in Afghanistan to stave off an impending foreign policy disaster. While the details will vary, this is the sort of initiative the Obama administration should be making now to protect our interests, strengthen a strategic relationship with the one free nation in the region, and counter China’s economic imperialism and its growing strategic alliance in the Muslim world. The clock is ticking, and America’s ability to influence events will last only so long as we do. Once out of the region, the US will be powerless to stop Islamist or Chinese expansion to the detriment of our interests—unless we have an ally in place that shares them.